2010 Volume No 20 – pages 316-328
|
Title: An RGD-restricted substrate interface is sufficient for the adhesion, growth and cartilage forming capacity of human chondrocytes |
Author: D Vonwil, M Schuler, A Barbero, S Ströbel, D Wendt, M Textor, U Aebi, I Martin |
|
Address: Institute for Surgical Research and Hospital Management, University Hospital Basel, Hebelstrasse 20, CH-4031 Basel, Switzerland |
|
E-mail: imartin at uhbs.ch |
|
Key Words: Biomimetics, cartilage repair, cartilage differentiation, cell motility, cell proliferation. |
|
Publication date: November 11th 2010 |
|
Abstract: This study aimed at testing whether an RGD-restricted substrate interface is sufficient for adhesion and growth of human articular chondrocytes (HAC), and whether it enhances their post expansion chondrogenic capacity. HAC/substrate interaction was restricted to RGD by modifying tissue culture polystyrene (TCPS) with a poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) based copolymer system that renders the surface resistant to protein adsorption while at the same time presenting the bioactive RGD-containing peptide GCRGYGRGDSPG (RGD). As compared to TCPS, HAC cultured on RGD spread faster (1.9-fold), maintained higher type II collagen mRNA expression (4.9-fold) and displayed a 19% lower spreading area. On RGD, HAC attachment efficiency (66±10%) and proliferation rate (0.56±0.04 doublings/day), as well as type II collagen mRNA expression in the subsequent chondrogenic differentiation phase, were similar to those of cells cultured on TCPS. In contrast, cartilaginous matrix deposition by HAC expanded on RGD was slightly but consistently higher (15% higher glycosaminoglycan-to-DNA ratio). RDG (bioinactive peptide) and PEG (no peptide ligand) controls yielded drastically reduced attachment efficiency (lower than 11%) and proliferation (lower than 0.20 doublings/day). Collectively, these data indicate that restriction of HAC interaction with a substrate through RGD peptides is sufficient to support their adhesion, growth and maintenance of cartilage forming capacity. The concept could thus be implemented in materials for cartilage repair, whereby in situ recruited/infiltrated chondroprogenitor cells would proliferate while maintaining their ability to differentiate and generate cartilage tissue. |
|
Article download: Pages
316-328 (PDF file) |
|